OPEN-WEIGHT AGENT INTELLIGENCE

Models for AI agents.

Discover open-weight model components for AI agents, from reasoning cores to retrieval, decision and media tools. Explore 12 Leading and 19 Notable models with source-linked facts—not invented agent-readiness scores.

31Curated models
12Leading
19Notable
0Assumed agent benchmarks

START WITH THE TASK

Six paths to a useful agent.

Agent architecture determines which model component matters. A retrieval encoder or image generator may support an agent without acting as the planning model.

EXPLORE USE CASETool CallingTool calling is a system behavior, not a guarantee conferred by downloadable weights. Assess the model's tool-use training, chat template, serving parser, output validity and multi-step task success separately.Explore guide →EXPLORE USE CASECodingA useful coding agent must inspect a repository, produce applicable patches and pass tests under controlled permissions. A model's coding-oriented category alone cannot establish autonomous software-engineering performance.Explore guide →EXPLORE USE CASEResearchResearch-agent quality depends on retrieval, source selection, faithful citations and multi-step execution, not just the language model. Model-only reasoning benchmarks cannot substitute for end-to-end research evaluations.Explore guide →EXPLORE USE CASEDocuments & RAGA document agent normally combines extraction, indexed retrieval, a generation model and permissions. Embedding models support retrieval; they do not replace the agent's reasoning model.Explore guide →EXPLORE USE CASEComputer UseComputer-use capability requires a model or system to interpret screen state, plan actions and control an interface. Image-input support is not proof that a model can navigate a desktop reliably.Explore guide →EXPLORE USE CASEPrivate & LocalOpen-weight checkpoints can make self-hosted agents possible, but a private system requires local inference, tools, retrieval, logs and secure operations. Model licensing and hardware feasibility must be checked per artifact.Explore guide →

AGENT INTELLIGENCE 2.0

Trace the capability. Test the configuration.

Move beyond generic tags with 9 reviewed publisher capability claims, 7 attributed benchmark observations and 7 runtime references. These are not independently measured agent results.

MODEL EXPLORER

Make the shortlist explain itself.

All 31 Leading and Notable records are shown below. Filters narrow a research shortlist; they do not certify fitness for any task. Hardware values are mathematical weight-only estimates, not measured VRAM.

31 curated model records · results are not ranked

LeadingCore candidate

MiniMax-M3

MiniMax · Multimodal reasoning model

Parameters
427.04B
License
MiniMax Community License
BF16 weights
854.08 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

K2-Horizon-375B-A23B

Institute of Foundation Models (IFM) · Reasoning model

Parameters
379.167B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
758.33 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL

Xiaomi MiMo · Omnimodal reasoning model

Parameters
1024.22B
License
mit
BF16 weights
2,048.43 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

GLM-5.3

Z.ai · Text reasoning model

Parameters
753.33B
License
other
BF16 weights
1,506.66 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

Kimi-K3

Moonshot AI · Multimodal reasoning model

Parameters
2779.93B
License
other
BF16 weights
5,559.86 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

GLM-5.3-Flash

Z.ai · Multimodal reasoning model

Parameters
321.323B
License
mit
BF16 weights
642.65 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek · Text reasoning model

Parameters
763.205B
License
mit
BF16 weights
1,526.41 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen · Multimodal reasoning model

Parameters
28B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
55.56 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

Inkling

thinkingmachines · Text reasoning model

Parameters
952.378B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
1,904.76 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

Muse-Glimmer-30B

meta-models · Text reasoning model

Parameters
29.7766B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
59.55 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableCore candidate

gpt-oss-120b

OpenAI · Text reasoning model

Parameters
117B total / 5.1B active
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
233.66 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableCore candidate

gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

Google · Multimodal reasoning model

Parameters
25.8059B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
51.61 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableCore candidate

Mistral Small 4 119B A6B

Mistral AI · Multimodal reasoning model

Parameters
119B total / 6.5B active
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
238.80 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableMedia tool

Qwen-Image-2.1

Qwen · Image generation or editing

Parameters
7B
License
other
BF16 weights
14.23 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableMedia tool

FLUX.2-dev

Black Forest Labs · Image generation or editing

Parameters
32.2233B
License
other
BF16 weights
64.45 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableMedia tool

MiniMax-H3

MiniMax · Video generation

Parameters
33.123B
License
other
BF16 weights
66.25 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableMedia tool

LTX-2.5

Lightricks · Video generation

Parameters
Pending verification
License
other
BF16 weights
Not calculated
NotableMedia tool

Voxtral-4B-TTS-2603

Mistral AI · Speech generation

Parameters
4B
License
cc-by-nc-4.0
BF16 weights
8.00 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableCore candidate

Olmo-3-7B-Think

AllenAI · Open research reasoning model

Parameters
7.29801B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
14.60 GB (weight-only estimate)
LeadingCore candidate

K2-Horizon-3.7B

Institute of Foundation Models (IFM) · Compact reasoning model

Parameters
5.05826B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
10.12 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableCore candidate

Mellum2.1-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

JetBrains · Coding-oriented model

Parameters
12.1499B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
24.30 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableCore candidate

K2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4B

Institute of Foundation Models (IFM) · Sparse reasoning model

Parameters
37.4448B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
74.89 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableSupporting component

clef-omni

Cloudflare · Decision scorer

Parameters
35.2598B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
70.52 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableSupporting component

pplx-embed-v2-late-0.6b

Perplexity · Retrieval embeddings

Parameters
0.594322B
License
mit
BF16 weights
1.19 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableSupporting component

pplx-embed-v2-late-9b

Perplexity · Retrieval embeddings

Parameters
8.3927B
License
mit
BF16 weights
16.79 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableMedia tool

Qwen-Image-2.1-Turbo

Qwen · Image generation or editing

Parameters
7.11512B
License
other
BF16 weights
14.23 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableSupporting component

Darwin-27B-ZTC

FINAL-Bench · Typed decision scorer

Parameters
25.6246B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
51.25 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableCore candidate

Holo4-27B

H Company · Computer-use vision-language model

Parameters
27.3567B
License
cc-by-nc-4.0
BF16 weights
54.71 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableCore candidate

Granite 4.2 30B

IBM · Text reasoning model

Parameters
29.2768B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
58.55 GB (weight-only estimate)
NotableSupporting component

LightOnOCR-3-4B

LightOn AI · Document OCR & layout

Parameters
4.53927B
License
apache-2.0
BF16 weights
9.08 GB (weight-only estimate)
Evidence comparisonSelect 2–4 models

No model here is marked “agent ready.” Tool-call accuracy, GUI control and multi-step success are unknown unless independently assessed for the precise model-and-runtime combination.

FROM WEIGHTS TO SYSTEMS

Practical deployment, without assumptions.

A runtime supporting tool calls does not establish that a particular checkpoint works in that runtime. Verify weight format, chat template, parser, hardware and license first.

Questions about model selection

Are all 31 models complete AI agents?

No. The selection includes reasoning model candidates, retrieval/decision components and media models; an agent also needs orchestration, tools and safety controls.

Are Leading and Notable agent performance ratings?

No. These are existing curated catalog labels, not agent-task benchmark scores.