AGENT USE CASE · SOURCE-FIRST

Coding agents.

A useful coding agent must inspect a repository, produce applicable patches and pass tests under controlled permissions. A model's coding-oriented category alone cannot establish autonomous software-engineering performance.

What must be evaluated?

Repository understanding

Evaluate navigation across files, long-context retrieval and correct interpretation of project-specific constraints.

Patch reliability

Track edit application, compile success, test coverage, regressions and recovery after failing tests.

Tool use

Measure multi-turn use of shell, search and version-control tools only inside a disposable workspace with explicit permissions.

Cost and hardware

Compare actual sequence length, total interaction steps and memory pressure; weight-only GB values are not observed throughput.

9 catalog candidates and components

These model records are included by catalog modality or category, not by a verified task-success benchmark. Follow their primary sources before testing.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently asked questions

Is a coding model automatically a coding agent?

No. The agent additionally needs a sandbox, file and test tools, state handling and an approval policy.

What should be measured?

Patch correctness and regression tests matter more than an unsupported one-number claim of agent readiness.

READ THE ORIGINALS

Documentation and primary sources

REAL SOURCE EVIDENCE

Publisher-reported task results

Different benchmark versions are not comparable; no numbers below were independently reproduced by Open Model Weights.

Evaluate before deployment.

Model metadata is source-linked; agent task success, tool-call reliability and production readiness require separate tests.

Review the methodology → Return to the explorer →